Identity and verification
ALLRECA assesses the basic data of a participating company. Verification is an entry requirement and a snapshot, not a quality seal or a guarantee of future behaviour.
Status · assessment · not a quality mark
Collaboration only works if you can trust each other.
Through ALLRECA, hospitality businesses can share staff and delivery capacity with each other. That is why we provide clear agreements, transparent assignments and a system to report abuse and problems.
This page describes the collaboration and trust model. ALLRECA does not guarantee future behaviour of businesses and does not claim that fraud or misconduct is automatically prevented.
Hospitality businesses often already collaborate locally. ALLRECA makes that cooperation explicit: who does what, for which period, under which agreements and with which data.
The networks are meant for temporary staff capacity and shared delivery capacity. They do not replace an employer's own responsibility. They do make visible which agreements apply and where a dispute or report can be investigated.
Verification shows whether ALLRECA has assessed the basic data of a participating company. It is an access requirement, not a quality seal.
A verification status says something about the check of business data at that moment. The status is no guarantee for the quality of the food, the operations or future behaviour. Businesses can view their status and its explanation in their own ALLRECA environment.
Participation in a shared network can depend on verification and on the agreements within the relevant cluster. A status can change if data expires or must be reassessed.
Availability, temporary assignments, responsibilities, worked hours and financial settlement belong together.
In the platform environment, the relevant agreements and assignment data are recorded. Changes to agreements are made traceable. This does not mean that every change is permitted: the parties involved remain bound by the applicable terms and the agreements they have accepted.
In a disagreement, the recorded assignment, availability, hours and financial data can be used as context. A reviewer assesses the circumstances; the system does not do that automatically.
An employee remains employed by the original employer when temporarily working at another company.
Employee Protection protects the relationship between the employee and the original employer. A temporary assignment does not mean the employee becomes the property of the receiving business. The receiving business may not use confidential information outside the agreed assignment and must respect the network agreements.
At the same time, every employee has the right to independently seek or accept other work. ALLRECA focuses on specific misconduct, such as misuse of confidential employee information or circumventing agreed network procedures. An employee who chooses another job themselves is not an offense against the receiving venue.
ALLRECA can use operational data to flag unusual patterns, such as repeated cancellations, abnormal time entries or recurring settlement issues.
Such signals are meant to prioritize an investigation. They do not automatically mean there is fraud or misconduct. A signal is therefore always viewed in context, with attention to volume, sample size and the underlying data.
ALLRECA does not claim that all fraud or misconduct is automatically detected or prevented. Risk monitoring is internal decision support, not a public trust score and not evidence of guilt.
Participating businesses can report an incident when they believe an agreement, procedure or safety standard was not followed.
The report is linked to the relevant assignment or file. The party involved is given the opportunity to respond. A reviewer can request additional information, view the assignment history and record a finding.
Confidential internal investigation notes are not shared with the other participant. The participant does see what is needed for the business: the status, a request for information or response, a decision and the right to object.
Describe what happened and link the report to the task where possible.
A reviewer checks the report, context, and available data.
The involved party can respond and the reviewer can request additional information.
The reviewer records the outcome and the reasons. A report only becomes a finding then.
Where applicable, a company may dispute the decision or measure with justification.
ALLRECA works with escalating measures. A heavier measure is not automatically the first step.
A Workforce restriction does not automatically disable Delivery Network, and vice versa. A full account suspension is only possible if the circumstances and the applicable platform terms justify it.
Temporary measures have a clear scope and, where applicable, an end time. A company can dispute a decision or measure via the objection procedure. The original decision and the objection remain traceable.
Restaurants can define collaboration terms and determine who participates in networks on behalf of the organization.
A business can indicate which parties it prefers not to enter into a new partnership with. Such a block targets the relationship between two companies and does not exclude other network participants. Businesses can also set who approves assignments, who reviews financial data, and who submits or responds to a report on behalf of the business.
Participating in a network never obliges a restaurant to accept a specific assignment. Availability, suitability and the applicable agreements remain the basis for an assignment.
Trust is not a single status. Verification, agreements, signals, reports, dossiers, measures and financial checks are different mechanisms. They are separated below.
ALLRECA assesses the basic data of a participating company. Verification is an entry requirement and a snapshot, not a quality seal or a guarantee of future behaviour.
Status · assessment · not a quality mark
Collaboration agreements are recorded in a versioned way and accepted by both parties. A venue can limit a relationship with a specific party without excluding other participants.
Version · acceptance · relationship restriction
Operational data can reveal unusual patterns. Those signals prioritize an investigation; they are not a public trust score and not an automatic determination of fault.
Signal · context · human review
A report is linked to an assignment or delivery where possible. Uploading and viewing evidence is accessible to the parties who may see the file. Evidence is not guaranteed as forensically sound or malware-free.
Report · evidence · access control
A reviewer can request information, view the assignment history and record a finding. Prioritization is an internal tool for the order of investigation, not a public ranking or automatic decision.
Response · finding · internal priority
Measures range from advice to temporary restriction or exclusion from one network service. They have a scope and, where necessary, an end time. A business can contest a decision with reasoning; an objection does not guarantee an outcome.
Proportional · scope · objection
In a dispute, a temporary hold can block the release of a settlement. Financial risk signals are internal and support investigation. ALLRECA offers no guarantee fund, escrow or payment guarantee.
Hold · settlement · no guarantee
Risk monitoring, case prioritization, financial risk signals, internal investigation notes, and the Trust & Safety Center are internal decision-making tools. They are not a public product promise, not a trust score, and not an automatic measure.
ALLRECA does not claim complete protection, zero risk or automatic fraud detection. The mechanisms above are the documented controls; responsibility for behaviour, agreements and financial obligations remains with the companies involved.
Verification of companies, cooperation agreements, reports with status and investigations are not abstract policy — they are screens in the business environment.
Anyone who needs it sees here the status of a verification or an ongoing report. Network participants work with the same visible controls.
Verification · agreements · reports · status
An incident or report gets a status, a response channel and a treatment path in the system. What was reported can be found again — not only in an inbox.
This is the difference between “we trust each other” and “there is a recorded path when it goes wrong”.
Notifications · status · follow-up · evidence
See how temporary staffing and shared delivery capacity are set up, and how Safety & Trust supports the agreements around them.
What is in place in the platform environment: verification workflow, cooperation agreements, reports with status and reactions, evidence references, investigations, findings, proportional measures, objection procedures and restaurant safety settings. Market-wide rollout, communication and external legal review proceed in phases. This page contains no trust guarantee, certification claim or live performance.